We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Facts: When a resident applied for Section 8 benefits, she reported that she worked for U.S. Bank and earned total weekly wages of $375. The resident showed the local housing authority a current pay stub. The application also included an affirmation that the contained information is true, correct, and complete, and that any changes in income must be reported in writing within 10 days from the date of occurrence. The resident received rental assistance based upon the information submitted to the housing authority.
Facts: A resident, an unemployed single mother of four children, had been receiving Section 8 vouchers for eight years when the events giving rise to the conflict in this case occurred. When she completed her annual recertification process in June 2010, she signed a copy of the public housing authority's (PHA's) “family obligations” policy and watched a film explaining the policies.
Facts: A resident claimed that during her tenancy at a site she was harassed and assaulted by her neighbors for her alleged disability, that the site and its employees failed to take corrective action, and that her Section 8 specialist at the local housing authority conspired with the site owner to terminate her Section 8 benefits and to evict her.
Facts: An owner leased a rental housing facility for elderly residents to a local public housing authority (PHA). The PHA in turn entered into a housing assistance payment (HAP) contract with HUD to provide low-income housing under an amendment enacted in 1974 to the Housing Act of 1937. HAP contracts establish an agreed “maximum monthly rent” the property owners will charge residents, as supplemented by HUD's assistance payments to the owners.
Facts: A resident's daughter sued the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) for terminating the resident's enrollment in the Section 8 voucher program. HPD determined that the resident's subsidy should be terminated due to her absence from her subsidized unit for 180 consecutive days, and due to her daughter's failure to provide documentation that the building management had allowed the daughter to be added to the lease.
Facts: An owner financed the construction of an apartment building in 1968 with a mortgage insured under the National Housing Act. In 1992, the owner and the United States, acting through HUD, entered into a Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contract. Under the contract, in exchange for rent subsidies and other benefits, the owner agreed to maintain its property in a decent, safe, and sanitary manner. The original HAP contract expired in 1997, but it was periodically renewed.
Facts: A resident had been receiving rent subsidies under HUD's Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program for eight years when she failed to provide the local public housing authority (PHA) with timely change-of-income information required by local rules.
Facts: A resident signed a one-year Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher lease with an owner. The owner claimed that she served a “Notice of Landlord's Intention not to Renew Section 8 Lease upon Expiration of Lease Term” on both the resident and the office that managed the housing program. The notice allegedly stated that the lease would not be renewed and that failure to vacate at lease end would result in the owner's commencing an eviction proceeding. The owner filed for eviction, and the resident asked the court to dismiss this proceeding.
Facts: Residents sued owners for refusing to accept their Section 8 vouchers. The antidiscrimination clauses in New York City's Local Law 10 prohibit owners from refusing to accept these vouchers. The owners argued that one resident's household composition made her ineligible to use the voucher.
Facts: In August 2007, a resident fell asleep after taking prescribed medication for depression. He fell asleep while cooking a pork chop in a frying pan. While he was asleep, the pork chop burned and the microwave above the stove was damaged. The site owner later served him with a notice of termination and filed an eviction lawsuit against him.