On Sept. 4, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) took unprecedented action when they officially published an order in the Federal Register to temporarily halt all residential evictions to prevent the further spread of COVID-19. This national eviction moratorium, which covers millions of renters at risk of eviction, became effective on publication and will last until Dec. 31, 2020, unless extended.
The CDC and HHS justified the unprecedented order by citing the historic threat to public health posed by the coronavirus. Given the “historic threat to public health,” the order notes the purpose of the eviction moratorium is to “facilitate self-isolation by people who become ill or who are at risk for severe illness from COVID-19 due to an underlying medical condition.” The moratorium is intended to help implement stay-at-home and social distancing orders, while also preventing homelessness, which “increases the likelihood of individuals moving into close quarters in congregate settings, such as homeless shelters, which then puts individuals at higher risk of COVID-19.”
Here are answers to common questions related to the CDC-issued temporary national moratorium on most evictions for nonpayment of rent.
The order cites Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. §264 and a regulation pursuant to the Act, 42 C.F.R. 70.2), which grants the Secretary of Health and Human Services broad authority to enact measures to prevent the spread of disease.
The order defines “evict” and “eviction” as “any action by a landlord, owner of a residential property, or other person with a legal right to pursue eviction…to remove or cause the removal of a covered person from a residential property.” Therefore, the order appears to block all phases of the eviction process.
The order applies to every state and territory with reported cases of coronavirus. The order ensures that the federal moratorium applies in all jurisdictions, except where state, local, or tribal areas have a moratorium on residential evictions that provides the same or greater level of public-health protection than the requirements listed in the order.
In accordance with 42 U.S.C. §264(e), the CDC’s order does not preclude state, local, territorial, and tribal authorities from imposing additional requirements that provide greater public-health protection and are more restrictive. In other words, for jurisdictions that have their own moratoriums, the stronger protections imposed between the state or local moratorium and the CDC’s moratorium will prevail.
Effective Sept. 4, the order declares a national moratorium on residential evictions for eligible renters for nonpayment of rent and nonpayment of other fees or charges until Dec. 31, 2020.
However, residents may still be evicted for:
Yes, despite the order, residents are still obligated to pay rent or make applicable payments. The order doesn’t prevent owners from charging or collecting fees, penalties, and interest for late payments. While the moratorium provides immediate protection to renters, it’s not sufficient to prevent evictions once the moratorium ends on Dec. 31. 2020.
Under 18 U.S.C. §§3559, 3571; 42 U.S.C. §271; and 42 C.F.R. 70.18, a person violating the CDC order may be subject to a fine of up to $100,000 if the violation doesn’t result in a death, or one year in jail, or both. The fine increases to $250,000 if the violation results in the death of a tenant.
An organization violating the CDC order may be subject to a fine of up to $200,000 per event if the violation doesn’t result in a death or $500,000 per event if the violation results in a death or as otherwise provided by law. The U.S. Department of Justice may initiate court proceedings as appropriate seeking imposition of these criminal penalties.
The CDC’s order says a resident may be exempt from eviction for nonpayment of rent and other fees. To invoke the CDC’s order, residents must provide a signed declaration to the owner. Each adult listed on the lease should complete and provide a declaration. You can give residents claiming protection from eviction under the CDC’s order our Model Form: Have Residents Unable to Pay Rent Sign Declaration, below. The declaration requires the resident to agree that he or she:
Because of the requirement that the protected tenant be “unable to pay rent in full or make full housing payments due to loss of household income, loss of compensable hours of work or wages, [or] lay-offs,” there are some low-wage workers who haven’t experienced a drop in income who won’t be protected under this order unless they have “extraordinary out-of-pocket medical costs.” Out-of-pocket medical costs are considered “extraordinary” if they are likely to exceed 7.5 percent of a household’s adjusted gross income for the year.
If a resident claims protection from eviction under the CDC order but doesn’t appear to qualify under the order’s requirements, or hasn’t given you signed declarations from every household member, you can send him a notice like our Model Notice: Notify Resident of CDC Eviction Moratorium Denial, below. The notice gives the reason for the denial and asks the resident to contact you to provide further information.
No. While the order notes that HUD grantees, such as states, cities, communities, and nonprofits, may use existing funds, including supplemental Emergency Solutions Grants or Community Development Block Grant funds provided under the CARES Act, for rental assistance, the order itself does not provide any additional rental assistance funding.
A joint industry letter to federal lawmakers pointed out that the eviction moratorium imposed by the CDC, together with Congress’ failure to act on a robust emergency rental assistance plan, places the stability of the entire rental housing sector in danger. The letter notes that, without rental assistance, the real estate industry is being mandated to shoulder an unrecoverable financial burden that could lead to a greater rental housing crisis. The letter notes that without rental assistance, it will be impossible for housing providers, particularly small owners, to meet their financial obligations and continue to provide shelter to their residents. Furthermore, it saddles renters with an unmanageable amount of debt due to months of unpaid rent, potentially dating back to March.
A Virginia landlord filed a legal challenge on Sept. 8 and requested a temporary restraining order against the CDC order. Despite the landlord’s residence in Virginia, the case was filed in a federal court in Georgia, the state where the CDC is headquartered. The landlord’s case was taken on by the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), a Washington-based organized whose mission is to “defend constitutional freedoms—primarily against the Administrative State,” according to its website.
The landlord has requested that the court immediately suspend enforcement of the CDC order while the case proceeds to a final trial. A decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia hasn’t yet been issued. Unless and until the court grants this request for a temporary injunction order, the CDC order remains in effect.