We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 10, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 10, 2025
CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Broker's Buzz
    • Drafting Tips
    • In the News
    • Negotiating Tips
    • Plugging Loopholes
    • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Agreements
    • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
    • Q&A
    • Pop Quiz
    • Winners & Losers
    • Ask the Insider
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
    • Landlord Wins
    • Landlord Loses
  • eAlerts
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 10, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Tenant's Control of Parking Lot Makes Accident Work-Related

Tenant's Control of Parking Lot Makes Accident Work-Related

Nov 23, 2021

What Happened: A 70-year-old supermarket employee who just finished her shift stepped into a pothole while walking to her car. The workers comp board rejected her claim for benefits. Citing provisions in the supermarket’s lease making the landlord responsible for maintaining the shopping center parking lot and other common areas, the board concluded that the employer/supermarket didn’t control the parking lot where the injuries occurred. The employee appealed.

Ruling: The New Jersey state court reversed the board’s ruling.

Reasoning: In New Jersey, as in many other states, employment for purposes of workers comp coverage begins when employees arrive at “the place of employment” and ends when they leave it. Under the so-called premises rule, “place of employment” is interpreted as including not just the immediate workplace but also adjacent areas under the employer’s control. While acknowledging that the landlord was responsible for maintaining the parking lot under the lease, the court noted that the supermarket also paid CAM charges toward that maintenance. More significantly, the supermarket exerted a degree of control by using the area for “multiple business purposes,” including not just customer and employee parking but also deliveries, storing shopping carts, and as an area for employees to smoke.

  • Walker v. Saker Shop-Rite, 2021 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2078, 2021 WL 4058011

 

Owner Wins
    • Related Articles

      Township Immune from Municipal Parking Lot Lawsuit

      Right to Nonexclusive Use of Parking Spaces Doesn't Include Long-Term Storage of Equipment

      How Much of Replacement Tenant’s Rent Must Landlord Offset Against Original Tenant’s Debt?

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing