We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 12, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 12, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 12, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Court of Appeals Rules Against Westchester County in Fair Housing Dispute

Court of Appeals Rules Against Westchester County in Fair Housing Dispute

Apr 17, 2013

New York State's Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino will be required to support a bill prohibiting income discrimination in housing that he has fought for years or risk major fines for violating a court order, after a recent decision by a federal appeals court.

Astorino lost what is likely his final appeal in the long-running dispute over the county’s responsibilities under a 2009 settlement that requires Westchester County to remove barriers to fair housing. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a May District Court decision that said the county violated the settlement when Astorino vetoed a bill to prohibit landlords from discriminating against renters using government income such as Section 8 or Social Security to pay their rent, known as source-of-income legislation.

Astorino vetoed the legislation in 2010, saying it was flawed and would saddle landlords with unnecessary regulation. The veto put the county in breach of the 2009 settlement, which calls for the development of 750 units of affordable housing in predominantly white communities.

 

Not a subscriber? Click here for a free trial issue!

Online Alerts
    • Related Articles

      Westchester County Loses $7.4M in HUD Grants Over Housing Case

      HUD Rejects Westchester County's Action Plan

      No Evidence of Waiting List Manipulation in Santa Cruz County

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing