• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Departments
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Certification
  • Compliance
  • Crime & Security
  • Dealing with Households
  • Income Calculations
  • Maintenance
  • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
  • Dos and Don'ts
  • Q and A
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • HUD Audits
  • In the News
  • Ask the Insider
  • Ask the Insider
  • Send Us A Question
May 11, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 11, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 11, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 11, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Jefferson Parish Housing Authority Violated Federal Regulations

Jefferson Parish Housing Authority Violated Federal Regulations

Oct 11, 2012

HUD audited the Jefferson Parish Housing Authority in Marrero, La., as part of its annual audit plan to review public housing programs. The auditors sought to determine whether the authority operated in accordance with HUD and other requirements.

The auditors found that the authority didn’t always comply with federal procurement regulations or ensure that its expenditures were eligible and supported. Specifically, the authority:

  • Didn’t always follow federal procurement and other requirements for its accounting, legal, and auditing services;
  • Couldn’t support disbursements made for security services, a grant coordinator, and credit card purchases, and paid for ineligible credit card purchases;
  • Made ineligible payments to its commissioners; and
  • Created a conflict of interest when it made payments to a state legislator’s company.

These conditions occurred because the authority didn’t understand or follow federal regulations or its procurement policy, didn’t have adequate procurement or accounting policies and procedures or proper internal controls, and disregarded HUD guidance.

The auditors recommended that HUD require the authority to:

  • Repay $202,114 in ineligible costs;
  • Support or repay $453,793;
  • Develop and implement proper internal controls;
  • Immediately stop using funds for prohibited costs; and
  • Provide training to authority employees.

The auditors also recommended that the director of the Departmental Enforcement Center impose appropriate administrative sanctions against the authority’s executive director and board members for violating HUD requirements.

  • HUD Audit Report 2012-AO-1002: The Jefferson Parish Housing Authority, Marrero, LA (7/30/12)
HUD Audits
    • Related Articles

      Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority Violated HUD Requirements

      Stamford Housing Authority Didn't Properly Administer Federal Programs

      Freeport Housing Authority Didn’t Properly Administer Low-Rent Housing Program

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing