We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Q: A prospective tenant for my shopping center wants its cotenancy clause to provide that a specific well-known retailer that takes up a large space in the center must be replaced with a “major tenant” if the retailer goes out of business. I assume this means a tenant that’s large enough to fill the entire square footage of the vacant space. I’ve been focusing on some other hotly contested issues during negotiations. Should I be concerned about this term?
