We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 15, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 15, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 15, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » PHA Liable for Unit’s Bedbug Infestation

PHA Liable for Unit’s Bedbug Infestation

Nov 15, 2016

Facts: Household members sued the local PHA, alleging that the PHA was negligent because it failed to eradicate a bedbug infestation condition. The residents claimed that the condition began in 2012 and continued to date. The PHA admitted that the unit had bedbugs on and off over a period of time, but denied any liability. The residents asked the court for a ruling on the issue of the PHA’s liability for failing to eradicate bedbugs in the unit.

New York City law creates a warranty of habitability with regard to landlord-tenant relationships. Case law has established that the PHA is subject to the warranty of habitability. And the residents alleged a breach of the warranty of habitability by failing to eradicate the bedbug condition in their unit. The PHA claimed that there was no breach of the warranty of habitability either because it took all reasonable steps to eradicate the bedbug infestation or that the condition was caused by one or more of the household members.

The record didn’t show that the PHA acted in a way to indicate that the residents caused the infestation. There was no indication that the PHA ever undertook to terminate the residents’ tenancy for violating the lease terms or for creating a nuisance.

Ruling: A New York state court ruled in favor of the residents.

Reasoning: The law makes eradication of bedbugs in apartments the obligation of the owner. The court stated that this obligation is mandatory and cannot be waived, and that the PHA, in spite of its efforts, failed to eradicate the bedbugs.

The testimony of the PHA employees and the experts led the court to the conclusion that the PHA’s efforts, though perhaps well intentioned, were inadequate. For instance, the experts and exterminator all testified that the best practice is to remove switch plates, outlet covers, moldings, and other areas that commonly serve as harborage for bedbugs prior to spraying insecticides. The PHA doesn’t do this before applying pesticides. The court questioned how eradication could be successful if the industry-accepted protocols aren’t followed.

Also, PHA witnesses testified that unless there’s a complaint from an adjacent apartment, that apartment won’t be fumigated at the same time. Because the experts testified that bedbugs migrate and will leave one apartment if possible after fumigation, when the insecticide wears off, the bedbugs can return to the first apartment.

Also, the PHA’s expert, an entomologist familiar with the breeding habits and lifestyle of bedbugs, opined that after the initial treatment, a second application should be made within 10 days to two weeks for optimum results. There was nothing in the PHA’s work order records to establish that this procedure was followed.

  • Aponte v. New York City Housing Authority, October 2016
Recent Court Rulings
    • Related Articles

      PHA Not Liable for Disability Discrimination

      PHA May Be Liable for Discrimination

      PHA Not Liable for Deaths Caused by Lack of Smoke Alarm and Second Egress

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing